sábado, 30 de junio de 2012

When Friends Ask: “Why Don’t You Drink Milk?”

Nutritionally speaking, dairy foods are essentially “liquid meats”—but worse, because people drink milk, and eat cheese, guiltlessly—often thinking “milk makes my bones unbreakable, helps me lose weight, and makes my skin as soft and beautiful as a baby's tush.”  In their haste to sell products, the dairy industry has created an obsession over calcium that has become, in effect, a major contributor to the suffering and death of more than one billion people annually on Planet Earth from diseases of overnutrition—obesity, heart disease, stroke, arthritis, and diabetes.
In the late 1970s when I was developing the McDougall Diet—after reading the bulk of the nutritional science published since the early 1900s—I came to the conclusion that starches, vegetables and fruits were ideal for human nutrition.  I then asked myself, what would be gained and lost by adding other food categories (dairy, meats, poultry, fish, free-oils, sugars, etc.) to this elemental foundation?  In the case of dairy foods, I quickly eliminated the “calcium advantage” because Nature packaged her foods so efficiently that developing a disease due to calcium deficiency is nearly impossible on a diet of plant foods (See last month’s newsletter—February 2007). 
After almost three years of exhaustive research I concluded: adding dairy foods to my original plant-food-based diet would only supply more calories, fat, animal protein, cholesterol, sodium, microbes, and chemical contamination—ingredients that were making most of my patients ill in the first place.  In the final analysis, I found myself unable to discover any reasons to add dairy into the McDougall Diet—the hazards weighed heavily and any benefits were overstated, or blatantly falsified.  Yet the drone from the dairy industry’s propaganda continues three decades later.  I am the uncommon voice out there in the wilderness; people tired of listening without questioning will find my analysis of some of the dairy industry’s most familiar messages refreshing.
Dairy Products Taste Delicious—Actually the Additives Do  
The National Dairy Council refers to their products as “Nutritious and Delicious.” Undoubtedly, consumers love ice cream, cheese, yogurt, and butter.  But the reason is, they are loaded with sugar and salt; otherwise no one would eat them. The National Dairy Council knows the importance of adding sugar and other flavorings, reporting, “Studies show that elementary school kids drink 28 percent more milk when offered in “cool” flavors and packages.”1  When I was a child, my school required all students to drink milk daily. A small carton of white milk was 2 cents and chocolate was 3 cents.  I always splurged, because I gagged from the taste of white milk.  The reason plain milk is at all palatable is because it naturally contains about 30% of its calories as sugar (lactose).  Chocolate, strawberry, and other flavored milks contain additional sugar. The more sugar, the greater the attraction to dairy; witness ice cream with 52% of the calories as sugar.
My patients taught me how really disgusting basic dairy foods taste.  During my residence training in the mid-1970s, I cared for people with kidney failure, who were required to be on very salt-restricted diets.  One of my duties was to recommend they eat salt-less butter and salt-less cheese.  Their response was, “Doc, I can’t eat a glob of greasy lard.”  Without the salt, these yellow blocks of fat are unpalatable.


Sodium:
mg/100 calories
Sugar:
grams/100 calories
Whole milk
80
8
Chocolate milk
72
12
Yogurt (plain)
76
8
Yogurt (fruit flavor) 
53
17
Chocolate ice cream
35
13



Cheese (American)
383
1
Cheese (cheddar)
144
0
Cottage cheese (1%)
560
4



Butter (regular)
114
0
Unsalted butter
0
0
Adding salt and/or sugar to enhance the taste of potatoes, beans, rice, vegetables and fruits would be a much healthier and tastier choice, rather than mixing it with all that fat found in dairy products.
Dairy Products Build Bones - Actually They Damage Them, Too
The National Dairy Council writes, “A large body of scientific research collected in recent decades demonstrates that an adequate intake of nutrients (e.g., calcium) from dairy foods such as milk, cheese, or yogurt positively affects bone health by increasing bone acquisition during growth, slowing age-related bone loss, and reducing osteoporotic fragility fractures.”2  The truth is dairy products can have bone-growth-stimulating effects.
The primary biologic purpose of cow’s milk is to cause growth—from a 60 pound calf to a 600 pound cow in less than 8 months. This “miracle-grow” fluid has several qualities that help accomplish this feat. Cow’s milk is 50% fat, providing 600 “growth-supporting” calories per quart.3 Cow’s milk also has high concentrations of protein, potassium, sodium, calcium, and other nutrients to sustain rapid growth.  (In comparison, these nutrients are at a three to four times lower concentration in human milk than cow’s milk.3)
Dairy foods increase growth hormones:  In addition to calories and nutrients to support growth, cow’s milk increases hormones that directly stimulate the growth of the calf. The most powerful of these hormones is called insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1).  When cow’s milk is fed to people, IGF-1 levels also increase.  Studies funded by the dairy industry show a 10% increase in IGF-1 levels in adolescent girls from one pint daily and the same 10% increase for postmenopausal women from 3 servings per day of nonfat milk or 1% milk.4,5 This rise in IGF-1 level is an important reason for the “bone-building” effects of cow’s milk.
IGF-1 promotes undesirable growth too—like cancer growth and accelerated aging. IGF-1 is one of the most powerful promoters of cancer growth ever discovered for cancers of the breast, prostate, lung, and colon.6  Overstimulation of growth by IGF-1 leads to premature aging too—and reducing IGF-1 levels is “anti-aging.”7
Dairy Foods Raise Estrogen: The message that estrogen builds fracture-resistant bones (prevents osteoporosis) has been hammered into women’s minds over the past 4 decades by the pharmaceutical industry, selling HRT formulas, such as Premarin and Prempro. Food also raises estrogen levels in a person’s body—and dairy foods account for about 60 to 70% of the estrogen that comes from food.8  The main source of this estrogen is the modern factory farming practice of continuously milking cows throughout pregnancy.8,9  As gestation progresses the estrogen content of milk increases from 15 pg/ml to 1000 pg/ml.
Estrogen (estrone) production
Non-pregnant:             
15 pg/ml
First half of pregnancy:
151 pg/ml
Last days of pregnancy:
1000 pg/ml
Well-recognized consequences of excess estrogen are cancers of the breast, uterus, and prostate.
The overall effect of the Western diet is bone damage: The National Dairy Council would like you to believe, “There is no evidence that protein-rich foods such as dairy foods adversely impact calcium balance or bone health.10  But these same dairy people know this is untrue and they state elsewhere, “Excess dietary protein, particularly purified proteins, increases urinary calcium excretion. This calcium loss could potentially cause negative calcium balance, leading to bone loss and osteoporosis. These effects have been attributed to an increased endogenous acid load created by the metabolism of protein, which requires neutralization by alkaline salts of calcium from bone.”11 
Thus, dairy products have bone-building effects—IGF-1 and estrogen; and bone-destroying effects—dietary acid and protein.  The net result depends upon the final balance of these accumulative effects. (Note that calcium consumed results in little of either a positive or a negative change for the health of the bones. See the February 2007 McDougall Newsletter for details).  A common practice of researchers designing studies to show dairy is beneficial to bone health is to first neutralize the dietary acids with lots of fruits and vegetables or add antacids (like Citracal) to the experiment.12 By this means, the positive effects, like bone growth stimulation from IGF-1, will dominate.
Compare the acid load of various foods:3,13


(Renal Acid Load per 100 calories)
Cheddar Cheese
10.0
Fish (Cod)
9.3
Chicken
7.0
Beef
6.3


Peas
1.0
Wheat flour
1.0
Potato
-5.0
Apples
-5.0
Banana
-6.0
Tomatoes
-18.0
Spinach
-56.0
(A positive value indicates acidic, whereas a negative value indicates alkaline.)

Consistently, when populations of people who eat different diets are compared, rates of hip fractures increase with increasing animal protein consumption (including dairy products).  For example, people from the USA, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Australia, and New Zealand have the highest rates of osteoporosis.14,15  The lowest rates are among people who eat the fewest animal-derived foods (these people are also on lower calcium diets)—like the people from rural Asia and rural Africa. 14,15  Dietary protein correlates directly with the dietary acids consumed.

 
 
 
Dairy Products Make People Trim—That’s Not What They Tell Each Other 
The National Dairy Council writes, “A growing body of research indicates that enjoying 3-A-Day of Dairy as part of a reduced calorie diet can give adults better results when it comes to trimming the waistline than cutting calories alone.”16
The dairy industry promotes dairy consumption for weight loss, even though they know their campaign is false.  Consider the conclusion of a review article they funded that was published in a 2003 issue of the Journal of Nutrition, “Nine studies of dairy product supplementation were located: In seven, no significant differences in the change in body weight or composition were detected between treatment and control groups. However, two studies conducted in older adults observed significantly greater weight gain in the dairy product groups.”17 At the Dairy Product Components and Weight Regulation Symposium held on April 21, 2002 in New Orleans, LA. Dr. Susan Barr (who frequently works for the dairy industry), said “In conclusion, the data available from randomized trials of dairy product or calcium supplementation provide little support for an effect in reducing body weight or fat mass.”17  See, they know the truth, but fail to share it with the customers.  Research published since this review has been supported largely by the dairy industry and fabricated to support their profitable weight loss campaign.
Recommending Dairy is Racist
The National Dairy Council says, “Minorities who have experienced gastrointestinal problems consuming milk are learning new strategies to enjoy milk and other dairy foods. This means that minorities (and non-minorities) with lactose intolerance no longer need to miss out on essential nutrients provided by dairy foods. The health consequences of avoiding dairy foods, the major source of dietary calcium, may be especially serious for African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, and Native American Indians. Many minorities are at high risk of hypertension, stroke, colon cancer, and osteoporosis – diseases in which a low calcium intake can be a contributing factor.”18  This is fear-mongering at its worst.
White people have a high tolerance for the sugar found in milk, known as lactose.  Non-whites commonly have a normal, natural “intolerance” to milk sugars, and such sugars consumed after the weaning-time cause them intestinal distress with flatulence, cramps and diarrhea.  Milk makes 60 to 90 percent of these people sick. 
An editorial from the October 2006 issue of the British Medical Journal addresses this, “Furthermore, we need to ask the question of whether we are doing children a disservice by encouraging them to meet recommendations. Childhood obesity is on the rise in westernized countries, and dairy products—the main source of calcium recommended by nutrition guidelines—contribute greatly to the intake of fat and sugar in children. Nearly three quarters of the world's population are estimated to be lactose intolerant after the age of weaning and therefore do not tolerate the consumption of milk and other dairy products well. In addition, some studies suggest that the consumption of cow's milk increases the risk of some types of cancer.”19 Diary products do essentially nothing to help prevent or treat hypertension either—at best, a review funded by the dairy industry showed a reduction of 1.44 mmHg systolic and 0.84 mmHg diastolic.20 (By comparison, our results from the McDougall residential center show a 23/14 mmHg decrease in blood pressure in people with high blood pressure (150/90 mmHg or greater) in less than 10 days; and almost all of these people were taken off all of their blood pressure medication during the 10 days.)
Dairy foods are high in calories, fat and cholesterol; contributing to the cause of heart disease, strokes, type-2 diabetes, and obesity.  They are high on the food chain so they accumulate, in sometimes dangerous amounts, environmental chemicals. Dairy protein is the number one cause of food allergies and can cause more serious forms of “food allergy” called autoimmune diseases.  Dairy products are also known to be infected with life-threatening microbes, including E. Coli, listeria, salmonella, staphylococci, tuberculosis, bovine leukemia viruses, and bovine AIDS viruses. A more complete discussion of the hazards of cow’s milk is found in my May 2003 newsletter article, “Marketing Milk and Disease.” 
The Dairy Industry Remains Unaccountable
Because of their financial power and political connections, the people in the dairy industry can say whatever they want and no one can stop them. Questioning consumers, however, might ask themselves, “Why are humans the only animals that drink milk of another species, and continue to drink it after normal weaning-time?” And “Why would Nature (or our Creator) design us so that in order to get a necessary nutrient, calcium, we must risk our lives?
With a $206.5 million annual budget dedicated to confusing people and covering up the truth for the sake of profits, and with the current political climate, there is no hope of regulating the dairy industry—or more appropriately for such a hazardous substance, outlawing these cow products for human consumption.21 Fortunately, thinking people are freeing themselves and their families from sickness and obesity by learning that human nutritional needs are far removed from those of baby cows.
References:
3)  J Pennington.  Bowes & Church’s Food Values of Portions Commonly Used.  17th Ed. Lippincott. Philadelphia- New York. 1998.
4 Cadogan J, Eastell R, Jones N, Barker ME. Milk intake and bone mineral acquisition in adolescent girls: randomised, controlled intervention trial. BMJ. 1997 Nov 15;315(7118):1255-60.
5) Heaney RP, McCarron DA, Dawson-Hughes B, Oparil S, Berga SL, Stern JS, Barr SI, Rosen CJ. Dietary changes favorably affect bone remodeling in older adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Oct;99(10):1228-33.
6) Moschos SJ, Mantzoros CS. The role of the IGF system in cancer: from basic to clinical studies and clinical applications. Oncology. 2002;63(4):317-32.
7) Rincon M, Rudin E, Barzilai N. The insulin/IGF-1 signaling in mammals and its relevance to human longevity. Exp Gerontol. 2005 Nov;40(11):873-7.
8) Sharpe R.  Are oestrogens involved in falling sperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract? Lancet 341:1392, 1993.
9)  Janowski T.  Mammary secretion of oestrogens in the cow.  Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2002 Jul;23(1-2):125-37.
10) No evidence dairy foods adversely impact calcium balance or bone health: http://www.nationaldairycouncil.org/NationalDairyCouncil/Health/Digest/dcd69-1Page1.htm
11) Excess dietary protein, particularly purified proteins: http://www.nationaldairycouncil.org/NationalDairyCouncil/Health/Digest/dcd74-5Page1.htm
12) New SA.  Calcium, protein, and fruit and vegetables as dietary determinants of bone health.  Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 May;77(5):1340-1.
13) )  Remer T. Potential renal acid load of foods and its influence on urine pH.  J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Jul;95(7):791-7.
14) Abelow B.  Cross-cultural association between dietary animal protein and hip fracture: a hypothesis.  Calcific Tissue Int 50:14-8, 1992.
15) Frassetto LA .  Worldwide incidence of hip fracture in elderly women: relation to consumption of animal and vegetable foods. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Oct;55(10):M585-92.
16) 3-A-Day of Dairy as part of a reduced calorie diet: http://www.nationaldairycouncil.org/nationaldairycouncil/healthyweight
17) Barr SI.  Increased dairy product or calcium intake: is body weight or composition affected in humans? J Nutr. 2003 Jan;133(1):245S-248S.
19)  Lanou AJ. Bone health in children. BMJ. 2006 Oct 14;333(7572):763-4.
20)  Griffith LE, Guyatt GH, Cook RJ, Bucher HC, Cook DJ.  The influence of dietary and nondietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure: an updated metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Hypertens. 1999 Jan;12(1 Pt 1):84-92.

Escrito por

El mito de la Leche


¿Es el humano el único animal del planeta que para estar sano necesita consumir leche que ha sido diseñada para crías de otra especie?
Esta entrada fue creada por Yael de acapulco 70, http://acapulco70.com/el-mito-de-la-leche/

El coctél de hasta 20 sustancias químicas en un vaso de leche


Adaptación Luis R. Miranda

Mail Online
7 de Julio, 2011
Un vaso de leche puede contener una mezcla de hasta 20 analgésicos, antibióticos y hormonas de crecimiento, los científicos han demostrado.
Mediante una prueba de alta sensibilidad, se encontraron con una gran cantidad de productos químicos utilizados para tratar enfermedades en animales y personas en las muestras de leche de vaca, cabra y la leche materna.
Las dosis de los medicamentos eran demasiado pequeñas para tener un efecto en cualquier bebida, pero los resultados ponen de manifiesto cómo los productos químicos artificiales se encuentran actualmente en toda la cadena alimenticia.
La mayor cantidad de medicamentos se encuentra en la leche de vaca.
Los investigadores creen que algunas de las drogas y hormonas de crecimiento se dan al ganado, se mezclaron en la leche a través de la alimentación del ganado o llegaron allí por contaminación en las granjas.
El equipo español-marroquí, analizó 20 muestras de leche de vaca comprada en España y Marruecos, junto con las muestras de leche de cabra y de mama.
Su desglose, publicado en el Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, reveló que la leche de vaca contiene rastros de fármacos anti-inflamatorios ácido niflúmico, ácido mefenámico y ketoprofeno – de uso común como analgésicos en animales y personas.
Vea la tabla con la lista de los químicos encontrados por el estudio

También contiene la hormona 17-beta-estradiol, una forma de estrógeno, una hormona sexual. La hormona se detectó a tres millonésimas de gramo en cada kilogramo de leche, mientras que la dosis más alta de ácido niflúmico fue menos de una millonésima de un gramo por kilogramo de leche.
Los científicos, dirigidos por el Dr. Evaristo Ballesteros, de la Universidad de Jaén, en España, dicen que su técnica podría ser usada para comprobar la seguridad de otros tipos de alimentos.
Dr. Ballesteros, dijo: “Creemos que la nueva metodología ayudará a proporcionar una manera más eficaz de determinar la presencia de este tipo de contaminantes en la leche u otros productos.
Los laboratorios de control de calidad podrían utilizar esta nueva herramienta para detectar estos fármacos antes de entrar en la cadena alimenticia. Esto aumentaría la conciencia de los consumidores y darles los conocimientos que los alimentos son inocuos …, auténticos, pura, beneficiosos para la salud y libres de residuos tóxicos “, añadió.
Las pruebas también encontraron ácido niflúmico en la leche de cabra, mientras que la leche materna contenía rastros de analgésicos ibuprofeno y el naproxeno, junto con el antibiótico triclosan y algunas hormonas.
Los investigadores dicen que su nuevo test de 30 minutos es el más sensible de su tipo. Si los hallazgos son verdaderos para la leche española y marroquí, los resultados también podrían ser ciertos para la leche producida en Gran Bretaña, el norte de Europa o cualquier otro lugar.
El año pasado, científicos de la Universidad de Portsmouth encontraron que los peces estaban contaminados con el antidepresivo Prozac.
El medicamento se introduce en los ríos de la red de alcantarillado y juguetea con la química del cerebro de los peces, los investigadores afirmaron.
Estudios anteriores han demostrado que la cafeína se libera en nuestras aguas después de sobrevivir el proceso de tratamiento de aguas residuales. ¿Cuáles otras sustancias logran sobrevivir este tratamiento además de la cafeína?
Las hormonas de la píldora anticonceptiva y la terapia de reemplazo hormonal han sido vinculadas a la feminización de peces, lo que lleva a los peces machos de producir óvulos y otras sustancias han sido vinculadas a que varios animales se vuelvan hemafroditas o se desinteresen por la reproducción.
Científicos de otras universidades en otros países también están estudiando los efectos de los antibióticos, medicamentos para la presión arterial y medicamentos reductores del colesterol en la vida silvestre en todo el mundo.

 http://real-agenda.com/2011/07/07/el-coctel-de-hasta-20-sustancias-quimicas-en-un-vaso-de-leche/